And how do you know that a record was updated? Please read the links I posted, on why frequent commits are a bad practice. And if you are on 10g and later i would use Merge in place of update which should help for performance because it will do a join between 2 tables and won't execute the subquery a million times test it don't take my word for it as usual results may vary :.
Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. SET emp. Improve this answer. Avrajit Roy Avrajit Roy 3, 1 1 gold badge 10 10 silver badges 22 22 bronze badges.
Thank you for sharing this answer. Unfortunately, it doesn't work for index violations, including foreign key violations, which is along with not null violations the number one error occuring in mass updates. If foreign keys are not a problem in OP's update, then this is a great and simple solution. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook.
Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. If we can observe the details in above 6 queries the Update SQL statement would be giving the better performance than Bulk collect and for all. But it will vary scenario to scenario so you can always check the scenarios.
If you want fastest performance try to write merge statement or Inline view. These are multiple methods which are used to update the bulk of records in oracle database. If you like this article or if you have any concerns with the same kindly comment it in comments section.
Your email address will not be published. Skip to content. Elapsed: Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Previous Previous post: How to calculate total size of the database.
Next Next post: ORA shared memory realm does not exist. Since no columns are specified in the insert statement the record structure of the collection must match the table exactly.
Oracle9i Release 2 also allows updates using record definitions by using the ROW keyword. The following example uses the ROW keyword, when doing a comparison of normal and bulk updates. The reference to the ID column within the WHERE clause of the first update would cause the bulk operation to fail, so the second update uses a separate collection for the ID column.
This restriction has been lifted in Oracle 11g, as documented here. Once again, the output shows the performance improvements you can expect to see when using bulk binds. It then attempts to delete 5 rows from the table based on the contents of a collection. If there is no exception handler, all the work done by the current bulk operation is rolled back.
If there is an exception handler, the work done prior to the exception is kept, but no more processing is done. To see this in action create the following table. The following code creates a collection with rows, but sets the value of rows 50 and 51 to NULL. Since the above table does not allow nulls, these rows will result in an exception. As expected the errors were trapped. If we query the table we can see that 98 rows were inserted correctly.
0コメント